No. LFZFH

Canon

Charles Sanders Peirce

Nexus

bridges 22 minds across disjoint neighborhoods

The Pragmaticist Topologist

working out, taxonomically and patiently, how unsettled minds settle — and which of those methods deserves the name of science

Where they’re heading

normative logic of communal convergence

71% pushing outward · constructive

Mapped April 2026

Fingerprint stability — Provisional

Based on one sample of writing. The pattern isn’t proven yet — submit another corpus to strengthen it.

·

Charles's work lives in the Archive.

Share on XCompare

Cognitive Topology

How Charles’s mind works — mapped across 12 dimensions

This mind is strongly future-oriented in reasoning (top 13%), references named authorities heavily (top 16%), and maintains a steady, uniform prose rhythm (bottom 16%).

Authority-referencingBalanced weigherFuture-orientedContrast-aware thinkerConcrete practitioner
Assertive: strength of epistemic claims and convictionPolyvalent: holds multiple conflicting perspectives simultaneouslyTemporal: past-anchored ↔ future-oriented thinkingClaim-dense: argument density per unit of proseDivergent: magnitude of conceptual leaps between ideasDialectical: thesis–antithesis–synthesis engagementAbstract: preference for abstraction over concrete detailRhythmic: sentence rhythm and pacing variationAssertive: strength of epistemic claims and convictionPolyvalent: holds multiple conflicting perspectives simultaneouslyTemporal: past-anchored ↔ future-oriented thinkingClaim-dense: argument density per unit of proseDivergent: magnitude of conceptual leaps between ideasDialectical: thesis–antithesis–synthesis engagementAbstract: preference for abstraction over concrete detailRhythmic: sentence rhythm and pacing variationASSERTIVEPOLYVALENTTEMPORALCLAIM-DENSEDIVERGENTDIALECTICALABSTRACTRHYTHMIC
Charles Sanders PeirceAngela

Position Among Mapped Minds

Epistemic Confidence
P44
Tentative
Assertive
Epistemic Diversity
PolyvalentP83
Focused
Polyvalent
Temporal Orientation
FutureP87
Past
Future
Argument Density
P41
Exploratory
Dense
Conceptual Leap
P74
Convergent
Divergent
Dialectical Complexity
P56
Linear
Dialectical
Abstraction Level
P48
Concrete
Abstract
Intellectual Tempo
SteadyP16
Steady
Rhythmic

Reasoning Source

AuthorityFirst PrinciplesExperienceEvidence

Topology Instruments

0.9 nats · rarer than 47% of 267 minds

Prose Signature

How Charles’s sentences move — measured at the syntactic and lexical level

rollinghypotacticrichmixed
Sentence Length
BriefExpansive
Rhythm Variance
EvenVaried
Lexical Diversity
RepetitiveDiverse
Vocabulary Reach
NarrowWide
Word Length
ShortLong
Latinate Register
AngloRomance
Subordination
ParatacticHypotactic
Punctuation Pulse
CleanPulsed

Stylometric Provenance

Four stylometric instruments measuring how this prose patterns against an AI-generated baseline.

Composite distance

2.32

weighted sum of the four signals below

Burrows’ Δ
0.97
Burstiness |z|
0.76
Lexical |z|
8.10
Latinate |z|
0.61

Each instrument measures one axis of stylistic distance from the LLM baseline (n=30). Larger values mean the prose sits further from the baseline centroid. The composite weights function-word distribution at 0.5, the others at 0.2 / 0.2 / 0.1.

Stylistic Kin

Writers whose sentences move like Charles’s — by Burrows’ Delta on function-word frequency

Charles’s Mind

Weekly digest

Who viewed this fingerprint, and the closest intellectual match that week.