No. R7CPI

Canon

Anton Howes

Isolate

genuinely singular

The Revisionist Historian

“Revising the history of innovation by excavating the economic, institutional, and cultural conditions that actually made invention possible — and the myths that obscure them”

Where they’re heading

→ A predictive institutional theory of innovation

71% pushing outward · synthetic

Mapped April 2026

Fingerprint stability — Provisional

Based on one sample of writing. The pattern isn’t proven yet — submit another corpus to strengthen it.

·

Anton hasn't joined Rodin yet.

Share on XCompare

Cognitive Topology

How Anton’s mind works — mapped across 12 dimensions

This mind is strongly past-anchored in reasoning (bottom 1%), leans heavily on data and evidence (top 3%), and writes with exceptional conviction (top 7%).

Evidence-driven reasonerAssertive and decisivePast-anchoredLinear argument builderBalanced abstraction
Assertive: strength of epistemic claims and convictionPolyvalent: holds multiple conflicting perspectives simultaneouslyTemporal: past-anchored ↔ future-oriented thinkingClaim-dense: argument density per unit of proseDivergent: magnitude of conceptual leaps between ideasDialectical: thesis–antithesis–synthesis engagementAbstract: preference for abstraction over concrete detailRhythmic: sentence rhythm and pacing variationAssertive: strength of epistemic claims and convictionPolyvalent: holds multiple conflicting perspectives simultaneouslyTemporal: past-anchored ↔ future-oriented thinkingClaim-dense: argument density per unit of proseDivergent: magnitude of conceptual leaps between ideasDialectical: thesis–antithesis–synthesis engagementAbstract: preference for abstraction over concrete detailRhythmic: sentence rhythm and pacing variationASSERTIVEPOLYVALENTTEMPORALCLAIM-DENSEDIVERGENTDIALECTICALABSTRACTRHYTHMIC
Anton HowesTim Howard

Position Among Mapped Minds

Epistemic Confidence
AssertiveP93
Tentative
Assertive
Epistemic Diversity
P32
Focused
Polyvalent
Temporal Orientation
PastP1
Past
Future
Argument Density
DenseP89
Exploratory
Dense
Conceptual Leap
ConvergentP8
Convergent
Divergent
Dialectical Complexity
P57
Linear
Dialectical
Abstraction Level
P65
Concrete
Abstract
Intellectual Tempo
P41
Steady
Rhythmic

Reasoning Source

AuthorityFirst PrinciplesExperienceEvidence

Topology Instruments

✦

1.3 nats · rarer than 83% of 266 minds

Prose Signature

How Anton’s sentences move — measured at the syntactic and lexical level

balancedhypotacticbaroqueLatinate
Sentence Length
BriefExpansive
Rhythm Variance
EvenVaried
Lexical Diversity
RepetitiveDiverse
Vocabulary Reach
NarrowWide
Word Length
ShortLong
Latinate Register
AngloRomance
Subordination
ParatacticHypotactic
Punctuation Pulse
CleanPulsed

Stylometric Provenance

Four stylometric instruments measuring how this prose patterns against an AI-generated baseline.

Composite distance

1.03

weighted sum of the four signals below

Burrows’ Δ
1.03
Burstiness |z|
1.15
Lexical |z|
1.43
Latinate |z|
0.02

Each instrument measures one axis of stylistic distance from the LLM baseline (n=30). Larger values mean the prose sits further from the baseline centroid. The composite weights function-word distribution at 0.5, the others at 0.2 / 0.2 / 0.1.

Stylistic Kin

Writers whose sentences move like Anton’s — by Burrows’ Delta on function-word frequency

Anton’s Mind

Weekly digest

Who viewed this fingerprint, and the closest intellectual match that week.