No. FSIJM

Canon

The Gospel of Matthew

Isolate

genuinely singular

The Radical Interiorist

“This thinker holds that every external form — law, ritual, reputation, kinship, wealth — is not merely insufficient but actively corrupts the interior reality it was meant to protect, and that the entire visible social order must be inverted before anything true can be built.”

Where they’re heading

→ conditions that produce receptive ground

71% pushing outward · constructive

Mapped April 2026

Fingerprint stability — Provisional

Based on one sample of writing. The pattern isn’t proven yet — submit another corpus to strengthen it.

·

The Gospel of Matthew's work lives in the Archive.

Share on XCompare

Cognitive Topology

How The Gospel of Matthew’s mind works — mapped across 12 dimensions

This mind is strongly future-oriented in reasoning (top 0%), builds from accumulated frameworks rather than axioms (bottom 0%), and stays close to concrete, observable ground (bottom 0%).

Authority-referencing / Experience-drivenMeasured pragmatistFuture-orientedLinear builderConcrete practitioner
Assertive: strength of epistemic claims and convictionPolyvalent: holds multiple conflicting perspectives simultaneouslyTemporal: past-anchored ↔ future-oriented thinkingClaim-dense: argument density per unit of proseDivergent: magnitude of conceptual leaps between ideasDialectical: thesis–antithesis–synthesis engagementAbstract: preference for abstraction over concrete detailRhythmic: sentence rhythm and pacing variationAssertive: strength of epistemic claims and convictionPolyvalent: holds multiple conflicting perspectives simultaneouslyTemporal: past-anchored ↔ future-oriented thinkingClaim-dense: argument density per unit of proseDivergent: magnitude of conceptual leaps between ideasDialectical: thesis–antithesis–synthesis engagementAbstract: preference for abstraction over concrete detailRhythmic: sentence rhythm and pacing variationASSERTIVEPOLYVALENTTEMPORALCLAIM-DENSEDIVERGENTDIALECTICALABSTRACTRHYTHMIC
The Gospel of MatthewJason Yu

Position Among Mapped Minds

Epistemic Confidence
TentativeP17
Tentative
Assertive
Epistemic Diversity
FocusedP8
Focused
Polyvalent
Temporal Orientation
FutureP100
Past
Future
Argument Density
ExploratoryP14
Exploratory
Dense
Conceptual Leap
P57
Convergent
Divergent
Dialectical Complexity
LinearP18
Linear
Dialectical
Abstraction Level
ConcreteP0
Concrete
Abstract
Intellectual Tempo
SteadyP16
Steady
Rhythmic

Reasoning Source

AuthorityFirst PrinciplesExperienceEvidence

Topology Instruments

✦

1.3 nats · rarer than 79% of 266 minds

Prose Signature

How The Gospel of Matthew’s sentences move — measured at the syntactic and lexical level

expansivebalancedmoderateAnglo-Saxon
Sentence Length
BriefExpansive
Rhythm Variance
EvenVaried
Lexical Diversity
RepetitiveDiverse
Vocabulary Reach
NarrowWide
Word Length
ShortLong
Latinate Register
AngloRomance
Subordination
ParatacticHypotactic
Punctuation Pulse
CleanPulsed

Stylometric Provenance

Four stylometric instruments measuring how this prose patterns against an AI-generated baseline.

Composite distance

5.13

weighted sum of the four signals below

Burrows’ Δ
1.40
Burstiness |z|
4.04
Lexical |z|
17.54
Latinate |z|
1.13

Each instrument measures one axis of stylistic distance from the LLM baseline (n=30). Larger values mean the prose sits further from the baseline centroid. The composite weights function-word distribution at 0.5, the others at 0.2 / 0.2 / 0.1.

Stylistic Kin

Writers whose sentences move like The Gospel of Matthew’s — by Burrows’ Delta on function-word frequency

The Gospel of Matthew’s Mind

Weekly digest

Who viewed this fingerprint, and the closest intellectual match that week.